Grades, reports and scored calls stay free to read — no signup.
Early Quarterly Review and Signals by email — free, until we announce otherwise. One-click unsubscribe.
Every quarter we publish three distinct things — all grounded in the same data, all answering a different investment question. The Analyst is available any time — ask anything across all of it.
A country-level deep-dive: overall grade, KPI scorecard, grade rationale, top-20 policy priorities with the equities positioned to benefit from each, initiative execution tracker, and quarterly news. One PDF per country, per quarter.
The regional synthesis — which Asia Pacific countries are gaining momentum, which are stalling, and which equities sit at the intersection of the strongest country theses and the three structural mega-trends (AI, crypto, demographics). Top-5 conviction calls, cross-country company exposure. One issue per quarter.
The cross-country comparison layer — every covered country ranked side by side on fifteen investment-relevant metrics (country grades, GDP growth, GDP per capita, inflation, monetary stability, FDI, economic freedom, capital-account openness, exports, government size, FX regime, and more). See which markets are strengthening and which are deteriorating. Live, sortable, refreshed quarterly.
All three share the same data spine, the same editorial standard, and the same quarterly cadence.
Pacific Alpha Intelligence maps Asia Pacific country fundamentals to investment decisions. We grade every country A–F against the global distribution — C is the global average, not a regional consolation prize — track whether policy commitments are actually being delivered, and identify the equity names positioned to benefit when they are. One verdict, backed by ten KPIs, updated quarterly.
This is not a diplomatic exercise. We grade on the data, not on what governments want to hear. Coverage is Asia Pacific only — the region where the highest-stakes economic competition of the next decade is being decided right now.
Pacific Alpha grades on a world-distribution scale where C is the global average — not regional benchmarks, not aspirational ideals. The grade tells an institutional allocator something defensible about where capital can be productively deployed, and where it cannot. We do not market diplomatic verdicts; we market honest comparison.
The grade dictates the appropriate exposure route. A and B markets support direct single-name positions because the institutional infrastructure works — rule of law, audited disclosure, regulatory independence, minority-shareholder rights. C and D markets do not — and the reason is not just policy risk. Local microstructure is exposed to coordinated manipulation by domestic insiders that foreign passive capital cannot detect or counter. Five categories of risk stacked, three invisible from public information. No direct single-name foreign exposure in C/D markets, period.
Within A and B markets, broad-index exposure is not the same as informed exposure. A country ETF holds the mega-trend winners alongside the mega-trend losers — the AI-infrastructure names next to the legacy software companies being commoditised by inference at zero marginal cost, the demographically-resilient franchises next to brands dependent on younger populations that no longer exist, the fintech-and-crypto-adapting banks next to legacy lenders being disintermediated. Pacific Alpha applies three structural filters on top of the country thesis: AI (is the business a net beneficiary of cheap inference and AI deployment, or is it being commoditised?), crypto (does the business gain leverage from digital-asset infrastructure, or is it being disintermediated?), and demographics (does it benefit from aging-cohort productivity uplift and senior healthcare demand, or is its customer base shrinking?). A single-name position requires the company to pass all three filters, on top of the country-level Friedman screen.
When C/D-graded economic exposure is required by a subscriber's portfolio policy, the only route is A-grade-listed conglomerates with regional reach (DBS, OCBC, UOB, CapitaLand, Singtel and others) — the economic exposure inside the A-grade regulatory protection, audit standard, and minority-shareholder-rights envelope. No direct positions in C/D countries. No broad C/D country ETFs. Inherent economic and political risk is compounded by insider trading and corruption that foreign capital cannot detect or counter. The discipline is the product.
We do not promise alpha through generic stock picking. The empirical record is clear: ~80% of US active large-cap funds underperform the S&P 500 over rolling 15-year periods (SPIVA), and the pattern holds or worsens in international categories. What Pacific Alpha offers is country analysis paired with global-trend filtering to narrow the candidate universe, followed by fundamental company analysis on the narrowed set, framed by a 3–5 year horizon. Country-level grading and leadership-change detection through the Friedman framework and the Alpha Fragility Index. Three structural-trend filters (AI, crypto, demographics) at the company level. Single-name positions within A/B-graded markets where the institutional protection makes the fundamental work worthwhile. Defensible reasons not to allocate where the microstructure cannot support foreign capital. The implied return target is index-matching to better, with lower risk, through superior country selection, mega-trend positioning, and entry timing — diversification done honestly.
Select any Key Performance Metric below to compare all countries side by side.
Generic AI tools are good at synthesizing public data. They are trained to hedge — and that is exactly the opposite of what an analyst making a portfolio decision needs.
The Pacific Alpha Analyst is the AI trained on our proprietary Alpha Fragility Index, our Initiative Execution Tracker, our country grades calibrated against global distribution, and our editorial verdicts. It will say things your AI won't — like "Thailand's political class has chosen managed decline" — because those judgments are ours to render.
Above the country reports sits the regional synthesis layer — one quarterly publication covering all Live countries with the analyst-grade rigor of an institutional research desk.
The Alpha Fragility Index (AFI) is Pacific Alpha Intelligence's proprietary 0–100 scorecard that measures structural fragility in emerging markets.
We calculate it quarterly using five equally weighted pillars, each scored 0–20 and backed by the latest hard data:
| Country | Score | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| 🇻🇳 Vietnam | 58 | High Fragility — Samsung-dependent export machine hiding deep corruption and weak institutions. |
| 🇹🇭 Thailand | 69 | Very High Fragility — Managed decline with political paralysis, terrible English, and crushing debt. |
| 🇲🇾 Malaysia | 49 | Moderate Fragility — Most stable of the three but still held back by ethnic politics and brain drain. |
Pacific Alpha maintains an illustrative model portfolio — a set of hypothetical positions in A/B-graded Asia Pacific markets, each passing our AI, crypto, and demographics filters. Every position is documented with its thesis, entry price, and rationale. We publish the performance in real time to demonstrate the framework's output. Pacific Alpha does not buy equities, manage capital, or hold these securities.
When the thesis changes — leadership change, grade downgrade, filter failure — we exit and document why. The track record is proof of the framework, not a fund.
Asia is the largest economic opportunity in the world — and the largest squandered one. Across the region, the growth and innovation of billions of people is held back less by capability than by government: capital controls, opaque statistics, politicised institutions, policy that protects incumbents over builders.
We believe countries compete for capital the way companies compete for customers — and that this competition, made visible, is the most powerful force for reform.
The policies that work are not a mystery: open capital accounts, honest data, sound money, the rule of law. Pacific Alpha exists to keep the scoreboard public — grading governments against the world distribution, in dated, sourced judgments that cannot be quietly revised, so capital flows to the countries that earn it and the cost of bad policy becomes impossible to hide.
Pacific Alpha is an independent publisher of Asia Pacific political-economy research. It is not a registered investment adviser.
We grade thirteen Asia Pacific markets A to F, every month, against the world. C is the global median. Every grade is dated and names a source for every number, and none is ever rewritten: a new grade is added beside the old one.
It is built so that an allocator, or a bank risk team, can put a country call in front of a committee — and check it afterwards.
Public grades stay free to read. A license is for commercial use and the desk-tier feed. The API arrives in Q1 2027, and pilots open after the October 2026 scoring.
Our event odds will be Brier-scored in public from October 2026. Until that print, treat the scoring as a commitment, not a result.
For nearly two decades the World Bank published a ranking called Doing Business. Governments competed on it — not rhetorically, but by rewriting law. India launched a national reform programme in 2014 aimed squarely at the areas it measured and rose from 142nd to 63rd in five years, on the back of a new insolvency code, tens of thousands of compliance requirements removed and thousands of provisions decriminalised. A number published in Washington was changing what happened in capital cities.
On 16 September 2021 the World Bank discontinued it. An independent investigation had found scores altered in favour of particular countries in two separate editions — China's in the 2018 report, and Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Azerbaijan in the 2020 one. The pressure did not come from a rogue analyst. It came from the institution's own most senior leadership.
It did not fail because the idea was wrong. It failed because the instrument could not survive its own influence. The scoreboard became valuable enough that the people publishing it wanted to move it — and the method left enough discretion, applied quietly enough, that it could be moved without anyone outside noticing.
Every rule we operate under is an answer to that. Judgments are dated and append-only — a published grade is never moved, only superseded with the old one still visible beneath it. The scale is the world distribution, not a regional curve. Where a government's own statistics are contested we use independent sources and say that we are doing it. And we score ourselves in public, misses first. The job Doing Business did is vacant. We are rebuilding it so that its own success cannot corrupt it.
But ask it what it predicted about Malaysia last June. Every judgment here is dated, scored, and cannot be quietly revised. AI gives you a smart opinion today; it cannot give you an opinion it committed to a year ago and was willing to be wrong about.
That record is the product — and it cannot be back-filled, by us or anyone.
see the dated record →What we cannot see. We score published, dated instruments. Where a government acts through unpublished administrative guidance — China’s window guidance is the clearest case — we cannot see it and do not claim to. Our scores describe the law on the record, not the instruction behind it.
Credit risk has rated authorities — every bond, every covenant, every mandate cites them. Political-economy risk — the variable that decides whether a decade of returns happens at all — has no equivalent, anywhere. Pacific Alpha is building it, starting in the Asia Pacific. Authority of that kind is not claimed; it is accumulated, one dated, scored judgment at a time.
Predicting the path of a political system is a category error; the honest alternative is calibration. The slow variables — institutions, policy execution, monetary regime — are measurable. The phase transitions — wholesale leadership change — are identifiable. And calibration is testable: every event estimate starts from the base rate for its event class, moves only as far as named, dated evidence justifies, and publishes the result as prior → evidence → posterior, on the page. A vivid headline does not move a number unless the base rate says it should.
Headline odds are always decomposed — a 70% election times a 70% policy follow-through is a 49% real outcome, and we publish the multiplication. Once posted, estimates are immutable. Event odds will be Brier-scored in public from October 2026. Until that print, treat the scoring as a commitment, not a result. The discipline is mechanical, not aspirational: this site cannot be published if any estimate is missing its recorded prior.
The record is built to be cited — by people and by machines. The full judgment chain is machine-readable at corpus.json, because the next generation of research readers will be AI models answering questions like “how exposed is this portfolio to Taiwan?” — and models cite scored records the way they cite ratings agencies, rather than re-deriving the answer. Prose ages; a scored record compounds.
Brad Good was First Vice President and Head of Retail Branch Network at UOB Singapore — 1,600 staff and a $200 million division P&L — after Booz Allen & Hamilton and A.T. Kearney. He founded and ran OurGroup Inc., backed by the presidents of GE, IBM and MasterCard, until the dot-com collapse closed it.
MBA, Chicago Booth; MA East Asian Studies, University of Chicago; BA, UC Berkeley. Fluent in Mandarin — the Chinese sources are read, not translated. Pacific Alpha grades countries the way a credit analyst grades borrowers: systematically, publicly, and with accountability for every call.
An illustrative model portfolio demonstrating the Pacific Alpha framework in practice. Pacific Alpha does not manage client capital or hold these securities — we are a research and intelligence provider. Positions are hypothetical, timestamped, marked to market weekly, and benchmarked against MSCI All Country Asia Pacific. Inception: May 21, 2026.
| Asset | Market Value | Cost Basis | Total Return $ | Total Return % | vs MSCI AP | Qty | Avg Cost | Last Price | Date Acquired |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bitcoin
BTC-USD · Spot · Reserve
|
$271,167 | $250,000 | +$21,167 | +8.47% | +3.75% | 3.23 | $77,400 | $83,953 | May 21, 2026 |
|
Hyundai Motor
005380.KS · Korea Exchange
|
$539,254 | $950,000 | −$410,746 | −43.24% | — | 2,065 | $460.01 | $261.14 | May 28, 2026 |
|
Naver
035420.KS · Korea Exchange
|
$1,027,810 | $950,000 | +$77,810 | +8.19% | +3.48% | 7,146 | $132.94 | $143.83 | May 25, 2026 |
|
Sony
6758.T · Tokyo Stock Exchange
|
$990,348 | $950,000 | +$40,348 | +4.25% | −0.47% | 41,979 | $22.63 | $23.59 | May 25, 2026 |
|
Sea Limited
SE · NYSE
|
$1,087,511 | $950,000 | +$137,511 | +14.47% | +9.76% | 10,886 | $87.27 | $99.90 | May 26, 2026 |
|
Toss / Viva Republica
Pre-IPO · EquityZen / Forge Global
|
$950,000 | $950,000 | $0 | +0.00% | — | 45,174 | $21.03 | $21.03 | May 28, 2026 |
|
Realized P&L — Closed Positions
SK Hynix 742 sh. (+18.8%) · Tokyo Electron 3,000 sh. (+2.2%) · Closed May 28, 2026
|
$199,809 | — | +$199,809 | — | — | — | — | — | Closed May 28 |
| PACIFIC ALPHA · TOTAL (6 POSITIONS + REALIZED) | $5,065,899 | $5,000,000 | +$65,899 | +1.32% | −3.39% | ||||
| BENCHMARKS · $5M EACH · SAME INCEPTION | |||||||||
|
MSCI AC Asia Pacific
Index Reference · Regional Benchmark
|
$5,235,623 | $5,000,000 | +$235,623 | +4.71% | — | — | — | — | May 21, 2026 |
|
S&P 500
Index Reference · US Benchmark
|
$5,197,966 | $5,000,000 | +$197,966 | +3.96% | −0.75% | — | — | — | May 21, 2026 |
Thirteen markets graded — from Vietnam to New Zealand. The Philippines received its inaugural grade on 4 September 2026. Indonesia is in preparation.
Twelve Asia Pacific countries, graded A–F against the world distribution — C is the global median, not a regional curve. Every grade is dated and append-only: a published grade is never moved, only superseded with the old one still visible beside it. Where a grade moved because we changed our method rather than because the country changed, we mark it.
Two indices, one rule. The Pacific Alpha Index holds the ten largest companies in each market we grade A or B — seven markets, seventy holdings. Fat Brother follows the identical rule but is blind to the grades, so he holds all twelve markets we cover, the C and D grades included. He eats everything; it’s how he got the name.
Neither is a portfolio and Pacific Alpha holds neither.
The Pacific Alpha Index will not touch China, India, Malaysia, Thailand or Vietnam, because our grades say the institutions there cannot protect foreign capital. Fat Brother has no such objection.
If you advise clients, the teardown reads a client’s Asia sleeve against this universe — which holdings sit in markets the Pacific Alpha Index refuses. Run a prospect teardown →
Both columns measured at 5 August 2026 · USD, full market capitalisation
| Pacific Alpha Index | Fat Brother | |
|---|---|---|
| Markets held | 7 | 12 |
| Companies | 70 | 120 |
| Weight of the fieldat 5 Aug 2026 | $8.75T | $13.63T |
| China | none | 25.3% |
| India | none | 7.5% |
| Handicap | — | none. Identical rules |
The only difference between these two indices is which countries are eligible, and that is decided by nothing except the published grades. Everything else — construction, weighting, the cap, the rebalance calendar — is identical by design, so the gap between them cannot be explained by anything else. Both columns above are measured at 5 August 2026, Fat Brother’s base date, so the two are like for like. The Pacific Alpha Index card below reports $8.55T, which is the same seventy holdings at its own base date of 3 August 2026.
Price return, USD. Each index bases 1000 at its own launch, and the two launched two days apart, so the published spread between them is measured from 5 August 2026. Updated at each quarterly rebalance.
| Index | At launch | Q4 2026 | Q1 2027 | Q2 2027 | Since launch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Alpha IndexA and B graded markets only · base 1000 at 3 Aug 2026 | 1000.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Fat Brotherevery market we cover, any grade · base 1000 at 5 Aug 2026 | 1000.00 | — | — | — | — |
The Pacific Alpha Index bases at 1000 on 3 August 2026 and stood at 1025.30 on 5 August. Fat Brother bases at 1000 on 5 August, his own live date. The spread runs from 5 August — no credit for the two days before he showed up. No history, no back-test, on either side. You cannot invest in an index.
Four rounds a year, scored every time the grades publish. Same rule as ours, same weighting, same cap, no handicap — plus the five markets we won’t touch: China D+, Thailand C−, Vietnam C, Malaysia C+, India C+.
On points. Ahead of the Pacific Alpha Index on cumulative return four scorings in a row. That isn’t a rough patch — that’s our refusal to touch those five costing you money, and we print it in this table, in the same type as everything else.
By knockdown. Ahead by more than 5 percentage points at any single scoring. We don’t wait for the count; that one gets written up the quarter it happens.
He doesn’t get dropped the moment he starts winning. An opponent you can retire isn’t an opponent.
The grades, made visible as a consequence. Ten largest companies by full market capitalisation in each market graded A or B, capped at 10% a name, rebalanced quarterly when the grades publish. A downgrade removes a market at the next rebalance — never on the day, so nothing can be quietly adjusted.
The control. Same rule, grade screen removed — the difference between the two is the screen and nothing else. Not a recommendation, not something to hold. He makes our claim falsifiable instead of merely asserted.
The 10 largest companies by market capitalisation in each Asia Pacific market Pacific Alpha grades A or B. Seventy holdings across seven markets, capped at 10% per name. Rebalanced quarterly on the grade publication date.
No history is published. The index begins at 1000 on its base date because Pacific Alpha's grades begin in May 2026 — a back-tested record would require assigning grades retrospectively, which is the one thing our method forbids.
| 🇰🇷 South Korea | 26.1% |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 25.1% |
| 🇹🇼 Taiwan | 20.6% |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 13.9% |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | 7.1% |
| 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | 6.4% |
| 🇳🇿 New Zealand | 0.9% |
Hong Kong grades B, yet contributes 6.4% — because most of what trades in Hong Kong is not Hong Kong. Every larger issuer listed there is mainland Chinese and excluded below.
Ranked by market capitalisation in USD. Three names sit at the 10% cap; the excess is redistributed pro rata.
| # | Company | Ticker | Market | Market cap | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TSMC | 2330.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $1,896.1B | 10.00% |
| 2 | Samsung Electronics | 005930.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $1,102.2B | 10.00% |
| 3 | SK hynix | 000660.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $779.6B | 10.00% |
| 4 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial | 8306.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $257.2B | 3.77% |
| 5 | Toyota Motor | 7203.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $224.4B | 3.29% |
| 6 | BHP Group | BHP.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $215.7B | 3.16% |
| 7 | Commonwealth Bank | CBA.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $208.0B | 3.05% |
| 8 | SoftBank Group | 9984.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $196.5B | 2.88% |
| 9 | MediaTek | 2454.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $192.5B | 2.82% |
| 10 | Kioxia Holdings | 285A.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $172.0B | 2.52% |
| 11 | DBS Group | D05.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $164.8B | 2.42% |
| 12 | Sumitomo Mitsui Financial | 8316.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $161.2B | 2.36% |
| 13 | Tokyo Electron | 8035.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $159.9B | 2.34% |
| 14 | Fast Retailing | 9983.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $156.2B | 2.29% |
| 15 | Hitachi | 6501.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $152.0B | 2.23% |
| 16 | Advantest | 6857.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $145.5B | 2.13% |
| 17 | Delta Electronics | 2308.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $126.6B | 1.86% |
| 18 | Hon Hai Precision | 2317.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $109.3B | 1.60% |
| 19 | AIA Group | 1299.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $103.2B | 1.51% |
| 20 | OCBC | O39.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $101.1B | 1.48% |
| 21 | SK Square | 402340.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $94.7B | 1.39% |
| 22 | Westpac | WBC.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $91.1B | 1.34% |
| 23 | National Australia Bank | NAB.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $89.0B | 1.31% |
| 24 | Murata Manufacturing | 6981.T | 🇯🇵 Japan | $83.4B | 1.22% |
| 25 | ASE Technology | 3711.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $82.8B | 1.21% |
| 26 | ANZ Group | ANZ.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $78.5B | 1.15% |
| 27 | Hyundai Motor | 005380.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $72.1B | 1.06% |
| 28 | Wesfarmers | WES.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $72.0B | 1.06% |
| 29 | BOC Hong Kong | 2388.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $69.6B | 1.02% |
| 30 | Macquarie Group | MQG.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $68.3B | 1.00% |
| 31 | HKEX | 0388.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $65.9B | 0.97% |
| 32 | Samsung Electro-Mechanics | 009150.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $62.5B | 0.92% |
| 33 | Singtel | Z74.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $56.2B | 0.82% |
| 34 | UOB | U11.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $55.5B | 0.81% |
| 35 | Fubon Financial | 2881.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $54.6B | 0.80% |
| 36 | LG Energy Solution | 373220.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $51.8B | 0.76% |
| 37 | Samsung Biologics | 207940.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $46.2B | 0.68% |
| 38 | Cathay Financial | 2882.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $45.5B | 0.67% |
| 39 | Sun Hung Kai Properties | 0016.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $45.2B | 0.66% |
| 40 | Woodside Energy | WDS.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $43.2B | 0.63% |
| 41 | Goodman Group | GMG.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $42.7B | 0.63% |
| 42 | CSL | CSL.AX | 🇦🇺 Australia | $41.6B | 0.61% |
| 43 | CTBC Financial | 2891.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $39.3B | 0.58% |
| 44 | CK Hutchison | 0001.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $35.7B | 0.52% |
| 45 | Kia | 000270.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $35.3B | 0.52% |
| 46 | Quanta Computer | 2382.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $35.3B | 0.52% |
| 47 | Chunghwa Telecom | 2412.TW | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $33.3B | 0.49% |
| 48 | Techtronic Industries | 0669.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $31.2B | 0.46% |
| 49 | Celltrion | 068270.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $29.3B | 0.43% |
| 50 | MTR Corporation | 0066.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $25.8B | 0.38% |
| 51 | CLP Holdings | 0002.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $25.0B | 0.37% |
| 52 | Singapore Technologies Engineering | S63.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $24.7B | 0.36% |
| 53 | NAVER | 035420.KS | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $21.8B | 0.32% |
| 54 | Wilmar International | F34.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $19.3B | 0.28% |
| 55 | Singapore Airlines | C6L.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $18.9B | 0.28% |
| 56 | Galaxy Entertainment | 0027.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $18.8B | 0.28% |
| 57 | Power Assets Holdings | 0006.HK | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $16.0B | 0.23% |
| 58 | Keppel | BN4.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $15.7B | 0.23% |
| 59 | Jardine Matheson | J36.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $14.9B | 0.22% |
| 60 | Fisher & Paykel Healthcare | FPH.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $14.2B | 0.21% |
| 61 | CapitaLand Investment | 9CI.SI | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $10.4B | 0.15% |
| 62 | Auckland Intl Airport | AIA.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $8.8B | 0.13% |
| 63 | Meridian Energy | MEL.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $8.7B | 0.13% |
| 64 | Infratil | IFT.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $8.7B | 0.13% |
| 65 | Contact Energy | CEN.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $5.7B | 0.08% |
| 66 | Mercury NZ | MCY.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $5.6B | 0.08% |
| 67 | Mainfreight | MFT.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $4.1B | 0.06% |
| 68 | Port of Tauranga | POT.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $3.3B | 0.05% |
| 69 | EBOS Group | EBO.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $2.6B | 0.04% |
| 70 | Spark New Zealand | SPK.NZ | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $2.2B | 0.03% |
Every index publishes what it owns. This one is defined by what it will not. These are among the largest companies in the region, and each is excluded by a published country grade — not by a view about the company.
| Company | Why it is out | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings | Hong Kong listing · Chinese operations | China D+ |
| Alibaba Group | Hong Kong listing · Cayman VIE structure | China D+ |
| Industrial & Commercial Bank of China | Hong Kong listing · Chinese state bank | China D+ |
| China Construction Bank | Hong Kong listing · Chinese state bank | China D+ |
| CITIC Ltd | HK-incorporated · mainland-operating, Beijing-controlled | China D+ |
| Reliance Industries | India | India C+ |
| HDFC Bank | India | India C+ |
| HSBC Holdings | UK-domiciled · shareholder claim under English law | not an Asia Pacific domicile |
| Sea Limited | Cayman-incorporated · NYSE-listed | fails domicile and venue |
Eligibility. A market qualifies when its published Pacific Alpha overall grade is A or B. A grade change moves a market in or out at the next scheduled rebalance, never on the day.
Where a company belongs. By where it primarily operates and which legal system governs the shareholder's claim — not by listing venue and not by place of incorporation. Mainland Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong are China exposure, and China grades D+.
Weighting. Full market capitalisation — shares outstanding × closing price — capped at 10% per name with the excess redistributed pro rata. No free-float adjustment: float factors are proprietary, and depending on them would mean depending on another provider's judgement.
Currency and basis. USD, price return. No dividends, on either the index or anything it is compared against.
Sources. Market capitalisations and exchange rates are read per security on the valuation date. Constituent listing status is re-confirmed at every rebalance — a company that has been taken private or delisted is removed rather than carried.
Known limitation, stated. Exchange rankings differ in definition — JPX counts listed shares including treasury shares, which produces a different ordering for Japan than shares-outstanding does. One definition is applied across all seventy holdings; the others are used only as cross-checks.
The same rule with no grade screen — the ten largest companies in every market Pacific Alpha covers. 120 holdings across twelve markets, capped at 10% per name, rebalanced on the same date as the Pacific Alpha Index. He exists to be measured against, not held.
| 🇨🇳 Chinanot in PAI | 25.3% |
| 🇰🇷 South Korea | 18.0% |
| 🇹🇼 Taiwan | 15.8% |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 13.6% |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 7.5% |
| 🇮🇳 Indianot in PAI | 7.5% |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | 3.7% |
| 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | 3.4% |
| 🇹🇭 Thailandnot in PAI | 2.4% |
| 🇲🇾 Malaysianot in PAI | 1.4% |
| 🇻🇳 Vietnamnot in PAI | 1.1% |
| 🇳🇿 New Zealand | 0.5% |
The five markets flagged not in PAI are the grade screen, made visible. They are 35.8% of the market capitalisation Pacific Alpha covers — the part the Pacific Alpha Index refuses to hold. Fat Brother begins at 1000 on 5 August 2026, his own live date. No history precedes it and no back-test is published.
When a government moves policy from announcement to delivery — or when leadership changes in a way that shifts a country's economic direction — Pacific Alpha issues a Signal with named equity implications. Subscribers receive every Signal by email the moment it fires. Everyone else waits 48 hours.
We monitor betting markets as a preview to what might move countries — and their equities. Headline odds mislead, though. An 85% election probability is not an 85% chance your stock moves — the winner still has to act, the policy has to pass, the stock has to be exposed. Multiply those steps and the real impact probability drops sharply. Pacific Alpha shows the full chain.
A resolution authority is only as credible as its calibration — so we publish ours. Each quarter carries five explicit predictions: an unambiguous statement, an exact success criterion, a stated confidence. Once posted they are immutable. Each set is scored in public the following quarter — hit or miss, with a Brier score — and every miss gets a published post-mortem. After four quarters, the cumulative Brier score and calibration curve go on this page. The Q3 2026 slate:
| Prediction | Success criterion | Confidence | Outcome · Brier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇾 Pacific Alpha downgrades Malaysia from C to C− | Dated grade-change record (C → C−) published on or before Sep 30, 2026 | 40% | Resolved · No |
| 🇲🇾 Malaysia's AFI exceeds 55 at the Q3 review | Published Q3 AFI composite > 55 (currently 49); exactly 55 or below = miss | 45% | Resolved · No |
| 🇵🇭 The Philippines' first published grade is C− or lower | First published overall grade ≤ C− at Q3 2026 coverage launch; C or higher = miss | 60% | Resolved · Yes |
| 🇮🇩 Indonesia's first published grade is B− or higher | First published overall grade ≥ B− at Q3 2026 coverage launch; C+ or lower = miss | 35% | Void · no first grade |
| 🇯🇵 The BoJ policy rate is still 1.00% on Sep 30 | BoJ target rate = 1.00% at close Sep 30, 2026, per BoJ statements (external); any change = miss | 65% | Resolved · No · BoJ hiked 18 Sep |
Posted July 2026 · All five resolve by Sep 30, 2026 and are scored in the Q4 2026 review. Brier = (confidence − outcome)², where outcome is 1 for a hit and 0 for a miss — 0 is perfect, 0.25 is a coin flip; lower is better. Predictions 1 and 2 share a trigger (the Johor election) and are correlated — flagged here for honesty. Confidence figures match the live Event Probabilities estimates above at time of posting and do not update after publication.
Called, dated, and graded against the outcome. This is the track record a market resolves against.
Ahead of the decision Polymarket put a hike at 62% — meaningful but genuinely contested, with no-change at 34%. Pacific Alpha published both scenarios and one instruction: hold Sony regardless. The chain that mattered was whether a hike would strengthen the yen enough to compress USD-repatriated earnings before the structural thesis reasserts. PA's read: any post-decision dip is transient, not a thesis break.
| Event | Event odds | Channel | Stocks | Channel prob. | Net chance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BoJ hikes +25bp to 1.00% Polymarket Jun 9, 2026 |
62% | JPY strengthens >2% vs USD Higher rates attract capital inflows, compressing USD/JPY. Sony earns ~55% of revenue outside Japan — yen strength reduces reported earnings in JPY terms. |
6758.T ↓ Sony
Near-term earnings compression
|
60% |
37%
62% × 60%
|
| Structural thesis unchanged Sony's AI hardware pivot (sensors, PS5 successor cycle, imaging) is rate-insensitive. Earnings compression from FX is a reporting artefact — not a business deterioration. Any price dip is likely transient. |
6758.T ↔ Hold
B− grade thesis intact
|
85% |
53%
62% × 85%
|
An 85% headline event probability is not an 85% chance your stock moves. Once you multiply across what actually has to happen — the policy gets pushed, passes, and materially hits the stock — the real impact probability drops to 30–55%. This is the step most investors skip.
| Event | Event odds | Initiative triggered | Stocks | Initiative prob. | Net chance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee Jae-myung wins Polymarket ~May 3, 2025 |
85% | Chaebol governance reform Board independence, windfall levies |
005380.KS ▼ Hyundai
035420.KS ▼ Naver
|
65% |
55%
85% × 65%
|
| Crypto licensing / consumer protection KYC standards, exchange licensing — not market restriction. US/HK permissive shift reduces appetite for hard tightening. |
Toss ▲ Pre-IPO
Naver LINE ▲ Web3
|
35% |
30%
85% × 35%
|
||
| State AI / semiconductor subsidies HyperCLOVA X contracts, national AI fund |
035420.KS ▲ Naver
|
50% |
43%
85% × 50%
|
The 85% headline deflates to 30–55% actual impact probability once the chain is applied — and the crypto initiative flips positive given the US/HK permissive shift. Most investors never do this step.
A self-built portfolio can be accused of selection bias. An index cannot — the weights below were set by the index provider, not by us. This is the weighted Pacific Alpha grade of the Asia exposure most books already hold: each country's weight × its Pacific Alpha grade (world-distribution scale, C = global median). Exposure is measured in % of assets, never a count of names.
This is the actual product. Upload a client's documents and Pacific Alpha builds this instantly. Click through the tabs to see everything a subscribed WM sees for every client they manage.
Every client you add appears here. At a glance: total assets, asset mix, PA's computed risk rating based on their actual holdings, and how fresh the data is. Click any row to open their full record.
| Client | Net Assets | Equities | Bonds | PA Risk ⚡ | Updated | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HF Harrington Family Office |
$12.1M | $5.4M | $3.1M | High Risk | Dec 2024 ⚠5mo | Review BABA position |
WC Westbrook Capital Group |
$4.3M | $3.1M | $0.8M | Med Risk | Mar 2025 ⚠2mo | Q3 review scheduled |
CF Chen Family Office |
$8.7M | $6.2M | $1.4M | Low Risk | May 2025 | Korea opportunity — flag |
MT Morrison Trust |
$2.9M | $1.8M | $0.7M | High Risk | Jan 2025 ⚠4mo | Needs updated docs |
| Total — 4 clients | $28.0M | $16.5M | $6.0M | |||
| Ticker | Name | Market Value | Weight | PA Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | Alibaba Group ADR | $251,000 | 11.4% | 🔴 Sell |
| AAPL | Apple Inc. | $418,000 | 18.9% | — |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp. | $376,000 | 17.0% | — |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc. | $193,000 | 8.7% | — |
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway B | $162,000 | 7.3% | — |
| VOO | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | $145,000 | 6.6% | — |
| Fixed Income | ||||
| UST | US Treasury Note 4.25% 2027 | $350,000 | 15.9% | — |
| Cash & Equivalents | ||||
| SPAXX | Fidelity Money Market | $312,000 | 14.1% | — |
| TOTAL | 8 positions | $2,207,000 | 100% | 3 signals |
Drag in the whole folder a client hands their accountant at tax time — brokerage statements, K-1s, 1099s, all at once, no sorting needed. The Analyst reads everything together, extracts their full holdings, maps them against Pacific Alpha's country grades and three structural filters, then asks if you want to adjust any positions before running the full analysis.
| Address | Gross Value | Mortgage | Rate | Net Equity | As of |
|---|
| Security | Shares | Market Value | Unrealised G/L | As of |
|---|
| Security | Type | Coupon | Maturity | Market Value | As of |
|---|
| Security | Quantity | Market Value | As of |
|---|
| Fund / Partnership | Type | Capital Account | As of |
|---|
| Fund | Yield | Market Value | As of |
|---|
| Property | Lender | Rate | Balance | Payment/mo | As of |
|---|
Three, documented — the exact date, the thesis at the time, the equity implication. No price predictions; Pacific Alpha calls regime-level risk before it's priced in. Every Signal goes public 48 hours after subscribers get it, so the timestamp a client can check is the same one you acted on first. And the scorecard stays public whichever way it points: the model portfolio is marked to market in the open, misses included — currently +8.82% against the MSCI AC Asia Pacific price index's +3.88% since May 21, 2026. Showing a prospect the record that trails as well as the record that wins is exactly why they trust the wins.
Not another research feed to keep up with — two outcomes. To win an account: run a teardown of a prospect's portfolio and walk in with the Asia Pacific risks their current advisor never flagged. First client free, and the teardown takes minutes — not a week of study. To defend one: upload a client's holdings once and Pacific Alpha alerts you the moment a leadership change or policy shift threatens a specific position — so the first call your client gets about it is yours.
Not more to read. The next account won, and the current one kept.
Grow the book. One upload, about two minutes to set up — then Pacific Alpha does the watching.
Upload the documents your accountant already prepared — a consolidated brokerage statement, Schedule K-1, or 1099. Pacific Alpha extracts asset categories, geographic exposure, and holdings automatically. No manual data entry. Takes two minutes.
Every quarter Pacific Alpha refreshes country grades, KPI scores, and initiative stages across all covered markets. When Japan's political stability grade changes, or Vietnam's FDI inflows are upgraded, or a new Signal fires — the PA data updates automatically. You don't do anything.
Your client's holdings stay the same. PA's data updates. The intersection — which holdings are exposed to which grade changes, which initiatives, which Signals — recalculates automatically every time PA's data changes. You set the alert frequency. PA does the rest.
A plain-language summary for each client: "23% of this portfolio is in Asia Pacific markets. 60% of that exposure — 13.8% of the whole book — is in countries PA grades C or below. Three holdings fail our AI filter, and each flag carries its weight: a 0.5% ADR and a 15% allocation are different risks, and the report never pretends otherwise. Two positions are in markets where a Signal fired this quarter." Enough to have a specific, informed conversation — no research required on your part. And the arithmetic is simple: $99 a month plus $9 per client — a 50-client book is $549 — with nothing at all to pay until January 2027 — coverage costs a fraction of the annual fee revenue of even a modest account — the Signal that protects a client's position is the reason that client stays, and one kept client pays for the book.
Upload holdings for each client. PA maps them against current country grades and the three-filter framework automatically.
Add any email addresses that should receive Signals for this client — your own, the client's, an assistant, a compliance officer. Easy to change at any time.
Set alert preferences per client. When a Signal fires in a country they hold exposure to, you're notified automatically — before your client asks.
Quarterly grades (C = global median, not a regional curve; since Jul 2026 each grade = the mean of six equal-weight pillars — Growth, Income & Human Capital, Price & Monetary, Openness & External, Institutions & Rule of Law, Physical Capital — minus at most one documented risk-overlay notch, each overlay recorded in the public judgement corpus), KPI scorecards across 10 metrics, Top 20 policy recommendations, and the Alpha Fragility Index for Southeast Asia. Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, China, South Korea, Japan, India, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines are live now. Indonesia is next.
AI chat trained on Pacific Alpha's full data set. Ask which countries are downgrade risks, which equities benefit from a specific initiative, or how a leadership change affects a client's exposure. Answers in the PA editorial voice — not generic AI. A generous daily query limit, available 24/7.
Real-time alerts when leadership changes or policy initiatives advance — before they appear publicly on the site. Two types: Leadership Signals (head of government or central bank governor changes that shift the Friedman assessment) and Policy Execution Signals (when a tracked initiative advances a stage).
When a monitored prediction market event crosses your set probability threshold and intersects a client's known holdings, you're alerted immediately — with a compound impact analysis. Example: "Korea presidential election · 85% — Smith Family Office holds Naver (4.2% of book) and Hyundai (3.6%). Compound impact: 43–55% on 7.8% of the book." Every alert is weighted — exposure is measured in % of book, never a count of names. No research product offers this.
We grade, then we position — in a documented model portfolio, live and public. Six positions, all in A/B-grade markets, all passing our three structural filters (AI, crypto, demographics). When we downgrade a country, we issue a Signal the same day with the specific evidence and the equity action trigger. We don't recommend what the model wouldn't hold. Pacific Alpha does not manage capital or hold these securities.
Asia Pacific is the world's growth engine — and the easiest place to lose money for reasons that never appear in an earnings report: capital controls, cooked statistics, a coup, a leadership change that reprices a market overnight. That risk is why most portfolios sit out the upside. Pacific Alpha removes the excuse — country grades scored on real outcomes, and Signals that reach you before the repricing, not after.
Whether you manage your own portfolio or work with an advisor, you now have access to the same institutional-grade Asia Pacific intelligence that family offices pay analysts six figures to produce.
More than 9 in 10 professional money managers fail to beat the index over 15 years (SPIVA® U.S. Year-End 2025). The few who do share one habit: they were positioned before country-level re-ratings, not after. Those re-ratings — driven by leadership change — move entire markets faster than any earnings revision. Pacific Alpha tracks the fragility indicators that precede them, and signals you before the market prices it in. Source: SPIVA® U.S. Year-End 2025
Asia Pacific is 40% of global GDP and the thinnest-covered allocation in most books — the return case and the career risk arrive together. Pacific Alpha covers the region the way an allocator has to answer for it: superior country selection, earlier positioning on leadership change, disciplined exclusion of markets where foreign capital is structurally disadvantaged — and a timestamped, append-only record that answers "why were we overweight Korea?" at your next board review, whichever way the call went.
Pacific Alpha is built for family offices, asset managers, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, and bank risk teams that need an outside benchmark for the Asia country score they already run — without commissioning a custom research engagement.
Each market is graded A to F against the world, where C is average, and every grade is dated. Each comes with its KPIs, a written verdict, a named source on every number, and Signals when policy, leadership or markets shift. The Analyst answers questions across all of it.
Your whole firm reads it free. A license lets you use it inside your process — investment memos, committee packs, client materials, your own models — with a structured feed and API from Q1 2027.
For an allocator: in the right markets before the price moves, out of the wrong ones before the loss, and a paper trail that stands up to the investment committee, the client and the regulator.
For a bank: country limits set before trouble arrives, and a country score that passes validation because it was tested against something independent.
A coalition break, a party-leadership change, or a central-bank regime shift is one of the few events that rapidly re-rates a country’s risk premium. Pacific Alpha tracks the fragility indicators that precede those moments, grades countries monthly against the world distribution, and signals when a catalyst is forming. See Malaysia, downgraded 2 June 2026 — the day after the coalition broke.
"The investment case in Asia has bifurcated. Japan and Korea — now fully live in our coverage — are structurally rerated by forces that are real and durable: governance reform, semiconductor leadership, and defence rearmament. The ASEAN-5, meanwhile, are treading water. Only Singapore earns unconditional conviction. Vietnam grows but has not matured; Thailand is backsliding."
| Country | Grade | Direction | AI Posture | Key Development Q2 | PA Stance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Japan | B− | ↑ | Beneficiary — TSMC, Rapidus, Sony sensors | BOJ 1.0%; Rapidus 2nm on track; Defence ¥2.1T contract | OVERWEIGHT |
| 🇰🇷 South Korea | B | ↑ | Strong — HBM leadership is AI infrastructure | FSC governance mandate; Hanwha $4.2B Poland order | OVERWEIGHT |
| 🇹🇼 Taiwan | B− | ↑ | World's semiconductor chokepoint — TSMC irreplaceable | GDP 8.63% in 2025 — 15-year high; DGBAS lifts 2026 forecast to 9.64% on AI exports | OVERWEIGHT |
| 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | B− | ↑ | Compliant digital-asset gateway — Asia's first stablecoin regime; spot crypto ETFs | Reclaimed #1 global IPO venue ($34.3B, +210%); GDP 3.5% in 2025; CPI up to 76 (#12) | NEUTRAL |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | A− | → | Institutional AI hub — MAS-regulated, NVIDIA partnerships | Project Guardian pilot expansion; Sea Limited outperformance | OVERWEIGHT |
| 🇲🇾 Malaysia | C | → | Beneficiary — data centre boom, semiconductor assembly | Johor-Singapore SEZ progressing; FDI inflows steady at $11.5B | NEUTRAL |
| 🇻🇳 Vietnam | C− | → | Neutral — FDI tech assembly, limited domestic AI capacity | 8.02% GDP growth confirmed; Samsung dependency unchanged | NEUTRAL |
| 🇹🇭 Thailand | D+ | ↓ | At risk — hardware supply chain, limited services AI | GDP 2.4% vs 3% target; CPI lowest in 19 years — deflation signal | AVOID |
| 🇮🇳 India | C+ | → | Scale adopter — IT services exposed to AI disruption; sovereign compute push | FDI $81B record; growth steady at 6.5% — below the 8% Viksit Bharat target | NEUTRAL |
| 🇨🇳 China | C− | ↓ | Complex — domestic AI champions vs US export controls | FDI (BoP net) rebounded ~4x to $76.5B in 2025 from $18.6B in 2024 (SAFE); MOFCOM "utilised" ~$107B | AVOID DIRECT |
Signal routing, your client book, seats and billing — in one place.
Free until 2027. Just your email, no card. Passwordless: we'll send a secure link.
Add a client to see what your book would cost.
Every change here takes effect on the site as you make it. Nothing to save.
Each invited member signs in with their own email and sets their own routing. Removing a member frees the seat immediately and revokes access at the end of the current billing period.
Nothing is charged before January 2027 and no card is held. Cancellation takes effect at the end of the current billing period; access continues until then.
1. Agreement to Terms. These Terms constitute a legally binding agreement between you and Pacific Alpha Intelligence, LLC (Wyoming LLC) governing access to and use of the Services at pacificalphaintel.com.
2. Not Investment Advice. Pacific Alpha is an independent research publisher — not a registered investment adviser. Nothing in the Services constitutes investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. All research is provided for informational purposes only. You are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.
3. Access Tiers. Free ($0 — read/use on the site; personal, non-commercial use). Join the list (free, email only, until we announce otherwise; early Quarterly Review and Signals by email; personal, non-commercial use). Institution: publication access free; desk tier (API, data feed, commissioned coverage) by separate agreement. Redistribution or resale of research outside your licensed tier is prohibited.
4. Intellectual Property. All content — reports, grades, methodology, Signals, AI Analyst outputs — is proprietary to Pacific Alpha Intelligence, LLC. You may not reproduce, resell, or distribute content beyond your permitted tier without prior written consent.
5. Portal. By uploading client documents, you represent that you have obtained all necessary client consents and that your use complies with applicable securities laws and your firm's data policies. Client documents are processed in your browser and not permanently stored without your affirmative election.
6. AI Analyst & fair use. AI Analyst outputs are generated by large language model technology and may be incomplete or incorrect. They do not undergo the same editorial review as published research. Formal grades and positions in published reports take precedence in all cases. Analyst access is subject to fair-use limits that vary by subscription tier and may change over time; you will be notified as you approach your allowance. Automated, scripted, or bulk querying, sharing of accounts, and attempts to circumvent usage limits are prohibited. Pacific Alpha may rate-limit, throttle, or suspend Analyst access to prevent excessive use, abuse, or disruption of the service.
7. Subscriber Confidentiality. Pacific Alpha does not disclose subscriber identities to third parties and does not sell subscriber contact information.
8. Track Record. The Track Record reflects a model portfolio held by Pacific Alpha for transparency purposes. It is not a fund or managed account. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
9. Limitation of Liability. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Pacific Alpha's total liability for any claim shall not exceed subscription fees paid in the prior 12 months. Pacific Alpha is not liable for indirect, consequential, or investment losses.
10. Governing Law. These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Wyoming. Disputes are subject to binding AAA arbitration in Cheyenne, Wyoming, on an individual basis.
This is a summary for convenience. The full Terms of Service document governs in all cases. Questions: [email protected]
1. Who we are. Pacific Alpha Intelligence, LLC (Wyoming, USA) publishes independent policy research at pacificalphaintel.com. This policy explains what we collect and how it is used.
2. What we collect. If you register, your email address (and optionally your name). If you subscribe to a paid tier, billing details are handled by our payment processor and never stored by us. We do not run advertising trackers and do not build behavioral profiles of visitors.
3. How your email is used. Sign-in links, the research emails you opt into (Signals, Quarterly Review), and account notices. Every email includes one-click unsubscribe. We do not send marketing on behalf of anyone else.
4. Service providers. Membership and email delivery run on Ghost(Pro); hosting, DNS and email routing on Cloudflare; AI Analyst questions are processed by a large-language-model provider to generate the answer you requested. Each provider receives only what is required to perform its function.
5. Documents. Client documents uploaded to the portal are processed in your browser. They are not transmitted to or permanently stored on our servers unless you affirmatively elect to save them.
6. No sale of data. We do not sell, rent, or disclose subscriber identities or contact information to third parties. Subscriber confidentiality is a term of service, not just a courtesy.
7. Retention & deletion. Membership data is retained while your account is active. Email [email protected] at any time to access, correct, or permanently delete your data.
8. International visitors. Our services are operated from the United States. By using the site you consent to processing there.
9. Changes. Material changes to this policy will be posted here with a new effective date.
Questions: [email protected]
The Pacific Alpha Analyst is in private beta for Analyst- and Desk-tier subscribers. Enter your subscriber passcode to access.
Want more questions? Sign up free — 20/day
🔒 Conversations are not stored or logged. Nothing you share leaves this session.